Yeah that hitler thing is a LIE. Just because you dont like what he did doesnt mean you have to lie about him. I deleted it btw.
The quote's back in there. The source is: Infield, Glenn B. Eva and Adolf New York:1974 Grosset and Dunlap, Page 50 . We know Glenn Infield is a liar.
>>> "removed so it can't be copied" .<<<
This sounds rather... and the citation leads no where.
If there are no objections, I'm going to change the quotes from saying "so and so admitted to doing such and such." Admission implies wrong doing or embarassment, niether of which are the case here. This should also help clear up some of the inherent negativity of the article. 68.158.106.192 06:43, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
Can we have some pictures please? --131.111.8.96 11:05, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I think pictures of watersports can be found easily enough on Google and Fleshbot that it is not necessary to put them as part of an article on Wikipedia, since they would not further the informational value of the article more than an iota.
I would say no to pictures of some of the more disparaging acts, however, if something could be found that was related.. 68.158.106.192 06:45, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
: Wouldn't really add to the article.
There is a video used as a cite for Rockbitch in the Notables Section. Is this different then a picture used for demonstration purposes? 02:18, 7 July 2006 (FHU)
I removed this, substituting a reference to "skin rashes":
IMO, anyone allergic to urine has a very serious condition not particularly relevant to urolagnia: internal exposure is unavoidable except by (i suppose) "kidney" dialysis! Allergy means an immune reaction. Someone might be allergic to certain people's urine, bcz of substances in it that are not inherant to urine. More likely, what is referred to here is IMO some kind of chemical damage to the skin, similar to that produced by bleach or "harsh" detergents; those who are described as "allergic" may heal such damaged skin more slowly than others, or may just have had a heavier recent exposure.
I could be mistaken, but if so, IMO it's worth documenting. --Jerzy(t) 04:37, 2004 Mar 9 (UTC)
Rereading more carefully, i have removed to here the entire existing health discussion, namely
I am not qualified to write a discussion this detailed, but i know enough to know this one ignores some facts and IMO is therefore suspect as a whole, in an area where misinformation is dangerous and where there is personal motivation for exaggerating safety. I have substituted a much more cautious statement. I assume a less cautious and more useful one can be prepared, but first document on this talk page any stronger statements of safety. --Jerzy(t) 14:24, 2004 Apr 5 (UTC)
Removed from article:
Unlinke Jerzy, I am qualified to discuss this matter, having been a trained and practiced sexuality educator for the past five years.
Although urine contins body wastes, it is not toxic if ingested. The body's filtration system will send the wastes back to the kidneys for removal. One can ingest a toxic dose of concentrated urine or urea, just as one can ingest a toxic dose of caffeine or juice or anything else that is relatively harmless in moderate amounts. - UtherSRG 14:29, 5 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Yes, in fact, UREA is threapeutic for some forms of cancer.. and there is a rich, long, asian tradition of urine ingestion daily to restore health. Can someone look this up and add?
"Male porcupines use urine to soften the females' quills before mating." And thus, all the jokes about procupines mating are dispelled.
--Why is the contents list almost at the bottom of the page? Bob the Pirate 23:45, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
It isn't. It's at the top.
I think it should be made more clear that one can get STDs, like hepatitis, from urine (this is true no?). Some people might take the part about it generally being considered harmless taken together with "a small risk exists if a disease is present" to mean that IF a person has an STD, like hepatitis, then it is only a small risk of acquiring it--which I don't think is true, hepatitis is usually transmited through urine and feces if I'm not mistaken. --Brentt 05:57, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
Yes, this is an important distinction. The risk in general might be small, but if the partner is known to have a particular disease, then the risk might be significant. Eg, normally the risk of getting struck by lightning is low, but the risk is quite high if you insist on flying a kite during a thunder storm. More information is needed. 58.107.87.183 07:34, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
I wanted to split the main paragraph into subsections based on types of practices. Each section would give in detail the how and “why” of this practice. I felt that the sections were not ready to go into the main article and asked for help. Two problems arose. The main one is as the article states there is minimal scientific research into this topic. I drew tentative conclusions based on eight years of reading internet message boards etc. Although I clearly stated what I was doing it is not the policy Wikipidia to bridge this knowledge gap due to the ban on Original Research. The other problem was due to the nature of the topic the normal vetting process that might have made the article acceptable did not take place. 13:25, 11 March 2006 (FHU)
Well... maybe not subsections, but at least a clear distinction. It looks like we're taking everything and piling it all up into one thing, and it's main focus appears to be the drinking of urine. This should not be.
MOST Urolagnia fantasies do not include the drinking of urine at all, and is in fact not very popular. Writers of this article are turning it into something bigger than what it really is.
"Other variations include arousal from wetting or seeing someone else wet their pants or underclothes, or wetting the bed." -- this should strictly be the other way around. The article fails to include the tickling part of things, undressing while wetting, and does not emphasize that females are usually the ones doing the wetting and the guys looking on or urinating on them.
Urinating while completely nude is amongst the top of popularity. On a lower and tasteful scale along with that comes female urination in undergarments, a top favorite, and the lesser favorite, purposeful accidents while fully clothed (which includes the desperation. In fact, while in desperation, some refer to it as a dance.
You don't really need or require more research. You have an addict right here. Colonel Marksman 21:47, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
The article implies that for most people who have this fetish their sex lives are messes up due to this fetish and therefore they are in need of deprogramming. In 2006 is deprogramming recommended for all who practice this? For only those whom it causes problems for? Or anybody?. 11:58 14 March 2006 (FHU)
I am a real enthusiast, & in my experience for most folks drinking it is the ultimate pleasure.
Should R. Kelly be added to this page? Katana3333 23:46, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
What is the R. Kelly reference about? 04:14, 8 May 2006 (FHU)
The Wikipedia Page on Chuck Berry shows this
In 1990, Berry was sued by several women who claimed that he had installed a video camera in the ladies' bathrooms at two of his St. Louis restaurants. A class action settlement was eventually reached with 59 women on the complaint; Berry's biographer Bruce Pegg estimated that it cost Berry over $1.2 million plus legal fees. A Miami distributor is currently marketing video footage purporting to show Berry urinating on a young woman in a bathtub. Although the voice heard sounds similar Berry's face is never visible on the tape making his positive identification impossible.
I am not sure if he belongs in this section or not. I am leaning against putting him in based on this. If I was forced to bet my house on it I would bet that he is an urophile. The fact that he did settle while making him look very guilty is not proof that he is quilty. And even if there is solid evidence he put the camera in the bathroom the motive might have been to see nudity not urination. 04:26, 8 May 2006 (FHU)
This whole section is questionable. For instance, there's no evidence that Shirley Manson is actually a urophile - her quotation is probably
nude pictures of kate winslet hideous kinky kate winslet kate winslet naked pictures metacafe kate winslet nude metacafe kate winslet nude kate winslet the reader
Kate Winslet: Nude Scenes in 'The Reader' Were 'Nerve-Wracking' ... Video: One of Sandra Bullock and Jesse James' Last Public Appearances Together
Description: A very hot clip featuring Kate Winslet as she gets nailed by some ... TAGS: moviehotties, nude, little children, sex, kate winslet, nsfw, hottie clip of the day
See exclusive Kate Winslet photos and the latest movie clips and trailers ... Now on video and DVD. The Holiday ... would like to pass the gutsy nude-scene torch to, and Winslet ...
Kate Winslet, Kate Winslet nude, Kate Winslet pictures, Kate Winslet "Titantic ... Kate's most recent photo ops and downloadable audio and video clips from her career. Kate Winslet on ...
All Videos Trailers; Movie clips ... Kate Winslet Nude Scene [18+] Edit. Kate winslet nude ... Kate Winslet [18+] Edit. Kate Winslet VIdeo Enjoying...
watch hot kate winslet nude painting scene from the movie titanic. Watch Video about Kate Winslet,Kate winslet sex,Kate winslet hot ... nicely boobs of katti shown in this clip. By ...
Kate Winslet Feels "Awful" Filming Nude Scenes ... i want , images cate winslet and acteres more neud pic. and neud video clip
kate_winslet_goes_nude_photos_02 ... Megan Fox Mel Gibson Michael Jackson Miley Cyrus Mischa Barton Movie Murder Music Video ...
Watch this video in a new window ... clips nazi germany british ... Kate Winslet All Nude Scene - The Reader